25 June 2016

Trumbo (2015)




Dalton Trumbo: [challenging John Wayne] If you're gonna talk about World War II as if you personally won it, let's be clear where you were stationed - on a film set, shooting blanks, wearing makeup, and if you're going to hit me, I'd like to take off my glasses.
The 40’s and 50’s were a tough time for many in the Hollywood business.  Sure it was hard keeping the millions happy with a consistent flow of movies and battling the banter from movie critics and the public alike, however there was a much deeper unrest rearing its ugly head.
The background of the movie is quite a complicated story (a great outline can be read here on Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_blacklist), however in basic terms, the 30’s saw the great recession where many lived in great poverty whilst no doubt some survived less affected.  Then came WW2 and communist Russia became an ally in the war against Germany and once the war had finished there was a fear in the late 40’s into the 50’s that communist ideas and thinking were making its way to the public through a very powerful medium...the movies. The US Government formed the House Un-American Activities Committee to investigate people with possible links to communism who were previously or were currently involved in the Communist Party, had similar thinking or sympathy toward those ideas even minor ones such as equality among all people, workers’ rights etc.  The movie makers got involved especially when there were “equal workers’ rights” strikes being conducted and arranged by those who were thought to have current or previous involvement in the Party and so on.  This lead to blacklisting of 10 screenwriters (one of them being Dalton Trumbo) and eventually led to hundreds even thousands of people being affected and unable to find work in the movie industry and even outside of that.  Writers, Directors, Actors and Actresses (and others) were questioned in front of the Committee about involvement in communist activities or if they knew of people in the movie industry who may have had ties or even sympathy toward it.  These were then investigated and often added to the blacklist.  Some even had to flee the country to find work (such as the Director Jules Dassin).  This basically sets the background of the issues during these times.  The movie picks up just before the blacklisting occurred.
Dalton Trumbo (Bryan Cranston) and nine other screenwriters get unfavourable coverage as they start fighting for the rights of workers in the film industry.  Then come 1947 they get blacklisted and are unable to find work in the industry.  The movie essentially tells the story of not just the start of all this controversy but how they (particularly Dalton Trumbo) lived through it and what was the beginning of the end of this terrible time for many.  It’s a very interesting movie in many ways.  Firstly, we get to see actors portraying characters that we either know the names of or have heard of them such as John Wayne, Edward G. Robinson, Hedda Hopper, Kirk Douglas, Otto Preminger plus original footage of some other characters of the time.  Secondly, we hear of movies that Trumbo secretly wrote but could not be acknowledged on screen at the time due to the blacklisting.  Thirdly, seeing how all this panned out and what real like characters had an important part to play in putting this whole fiasco to death is fascinating.  

The movie has a bunch of quality actors/actresses such as Bryan Cranston, Diane Lane, Helen Mirren, John Goodman, Stephen Root and others who do a fantastic job and even the John Wayne and Edward G. Robinson (the line he delivers at the committee hearing is a little different to what he said in real life) impersonators are convincing.  The movie is well paced and keeps you in throughout its 125 minutes and for me it was exciting to watch, but I must say that I know of and own some of the movies this fella wrote so seeing how they came to be just added to the enjoyment of it.
The Bluray is not available in Australia, so the review was based off the DVD which in all honesty delivers a fantastic (1.85:1 aspect ratio) image that is sharp and clean.  The great mostly Jazz soundtrack suites the movie perfectly and sounds great via the Dolby Digital 5.1 surround sound.  There are also two short featurettes included in the DVD which are interesting but certainly not a making of doco.
Overall I very highly recommend the movie both as a part of what happened in movie history and simply as a quality movie.  You don’t have to be a fan of 40’s and 50’s movies to enjoy it as it’s one of those enjoyable “Based on a True Story” movie’s.  But it would be even more interesting if you knew of some of the characters being portrayed either by name or simply who starred in or made the movies you came to enjoy.  I wasn’t too sure what to expect from the movie as I do not recall it coming out at the cinema, but after seeing it I am more than certain that I will be watching it again.  Check out the trailer here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y_Pj--igG4

Movie
Image
Disc

3 comments:

  1. ***CARE SPOILER ALERT*** Don't read this if you have not seen the film!

    Interesting film isn't it? I especially enjoyed the jazz soundtrack, the wonderful acting, the mention of Roman Holiday, and a couple of conversations between Otto Preminger and Trumbo.

    Do you remember this? -

    Trumbo: Well did you read the new scene?
    Otto: Dreadful. Keep up this level of work, and I will see to it your name is on my movie... to take the blame.

    Later, Trumbo handed over a page of the screenplay he just typed to Otto -

    T: Well?
    O: Better.
    T: Thank God!
    O: But it simply lacks genius.
    T: Otto, if every scene is brilliant, your movie is going to be utterly monotonous.
    O: I'll tell you what, you write every scene brilliantly, and I will direct unevenly.


    That's hilarious! lol

    Did you know the film has been criticized as being historically inaccurate and overly simplistic?

    I wonder:

    1. Is this film pro-communist?

    for example, when trying to explain communism to his daughter, Trumbo used an example of sharing lunch, ie. communism is all about sharing what you have...

    2. Were all the blacklisted people completely innocent in every way?

    3. Was Trumbo really a hero as portrayed in this film?

    I read that he was an outspoken supporter of Stalin's brutal regimes in real life! When Stalin allied with Hitler in 1939, Trumbo actually wrote articles that attacked the British, suggesting it was unworthy of assistance because it was a monarchy, not a democracy (I don't know what he meant by that? Communism is not a democracy either!) Trumbo also supported the Nazi invasion of Poland, Norway, Denmark, Holland & France, and the bombings of London...

    4. Edward G. Robinson! Did he really betray his friends?

    If not, then it would be sad to see him being portrayed as a villain, it would be unfair to him, I think.


    Some food for thought! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep i do remember that part between Otto and Trumbo. Very cool :)

      As with so many things, I have heard both, that it is quite accurate and that its not accurate. I can't really rely on a movie to tell me truth but I can get an idea from it as to what happened at the time.

      I can't really answer all your questions, but:
      1. I would hope that its not pro-communist. Yes i did notice his explanation and I really took it as being a very simplified explanation of a very mild form of communism that "sounds" nice. But we all know what communist rule is like, at least today. Perhaps the communist thinking was a bit different to what we see it as today, but whatever the case I don't agree with communism at all.

      2. From the movie, they all seemed to believe in a mild form of communism. In real life...who knows. It would take a lot of research to find out exactly what they knew and I guess for me, its not really important enough to do that. Were they extreme or were they just holding to a basic form of communism that would bring equal rights? I really do not know. I would say that the movie paints it in a lighter tone than real life.

      3. Well he is portrayed in a heroic manner in a way, cause he assisted bring that blacklisting to a stop. So in that way, yes.
      As for what he exactly believed, I certainly do not condone the person whether he supported Stalin/Hitler or anyone else like them. The whole real-life background is a complicated story that they have tried to tell in a short movie, but the main point the film wants to bring across is the blacklisting and how it came to cease.
      Sifting through the lives of the people in real life would is some case just bring disappointment as we are all human and do not all share the same belief structure. To be honest, I'm not really sure I want to know too much about many of the filmmakers, actors or actresses as I am sure that their beliefs and mine would not match up :)
      4. I did read about Edwards speech and saw a video of if and it is different than the movie. From what I read and heard, he didn't rat out on his friends but gave a vague sort of answer if memory serves correct.

      There is a lot that can be seen and read through a movie, but we also need to take them with a grain of salt. They are just a movie and in the case of the "Based on a true story" films, they are only as true as the truth that is included in the film by its maker. For example, many war movies are incorrect and not historically accurate as they always include some poetic licence to make it better for the viewer. But having said that they provide a basic story that has some truth (which in some cases can be worse) and some untruth.

      We have the internet these days which can help so we do not get completely misled like the old "Fargo" movie which said it was one of those "This is a true story" which everyone believed until the rise of the internet at which time we found out that it was just a ploy to increase the shock factor!

      Anyway, they are just movies which we always need to watch with some discernment :)
      Along these lines, JFK is a great movie to watch as well :)

      Delete
    2. I think that's why one of the main criticisms of Trumbo is that the film is overly simplistic. According to some of the articles I've read on the internet, Trumbo in real life was an outspoken support of Stalin & Hitler, which was never mentioned in the film.

      But you are right, it's difficult to know what he was really like unless you want to spend a lot of time doing the research, and it's not that important to me either. At the end of the day, I'm still glad the film tried to focus on the blacklisting which is a very interesting topic for me (and a nice break from all the superhero movies we've been getting! lol), especially because Jules Dassin was blacklisted too.

      I don't have a problem with films taking poetic licence in historical subjects sometimes, but I think there should be certain limits, for example, I think that filmmakers should not do it in a way that would damage someone's reputation when they are innocent. I do not know why the film chose to portray Edward G. Robinson as someone who betrayed his friends? Sadly he is not alive to be able to defend himself, and I also think it would be quite hurtful to his family, eg. his children & grandchildren etc...

      Haha I did think, at the beginning, that Fargo was a true story! lol

      Ah you've reminded me, I've been meaning to watch JFK again! :)

      Delete